So far in this series, I have shared the first eight of 10 questions that you should answer before you decide whether or not to buy a share of stock in a particular company. The gist of these 10 questions is to help you understand the company you are investing in and items to pay attention to when sizing up what’s on the horizon, both good and bad. After all, how do you know how to gauge a company’s business and the competitive landscape if you don’t have a firm understanding of what the company does and how it makes money for itself and its shareholders? These are some of the tools I use each time I look at a new opportunity that I may share with subscribers to my Growth & Dividend Report newsletter.
If you missed that guidance, I encourage you to check out my previous columns: part 1, part 2, part 3 and part 4. These tackle the first eight questions:
If you haven’t reviewed those questions yet, and maybe even if you have, you may want to do so, because the remaining two questions build on the previous answers.
One of the more frustrating things I have heard during the last 20-plus years when it comes to looking at stocks is “It’s trading below X times earnings. That’s cheap!” Every time I hear this, I pause and remember that stocks tend to be cheap for a reason.
Flipping this around, it means you should have a reason for buying a particular stock at a certain time. If not, well, you’re pretty much throwing darts at that point.
Wall Street lingo borrows a term you may remember from your high school chemistry days — the catalyst. I profess that while I did well in math and other classes, chemistry was not my strongest subject. A catalyst, in simple chemistry terms, is a substance that increases the rate of a chemical reaction.
The same concept holds for investing in stocks as well. In some of the earlier questions, we identified potential catalysts — new products, new product categories and so on — that are expected to drive top- and bottom-line growth. Other catalysts include accelerating, if not favorable, economic or psychographic (the where and the how companies and consumers are spending) data. Here are several examples of catalysts:
Source: World Bank
Source: World Bank
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration
As you see in several of the above examples, catalysts often have a ripple effect that allows for multiple investment opportunities along the supply chain (Skyworks to Apple) or pain points (the growth in streaming that led to Internet bottlenecks that you probably experienced as sporadic Internet speeds, like I did). We’ll discuss more next week, with Question 10 recognizing that these multiple avenues offer a greater number of opportunities for you. In the above example, Apple’s shares quickly climbed in response to iPhone 6 excitement, but Skyworks shares offered the greater return.
In chemistry, the exact opposite of a catalyst is something called an inhibitor. A formal definition reads something like this: a reaction inhibitor is a substance that decreases the rate of, or prevents, a chemical reaction. To us, an inhibitor is a lot like a headwind that slows the speed of a plane down, while a catalyst is more like a tailwind that pushes the plane along, often resulting in a shorter flight time.
One of the best examples of an inhibitor or a headwind that led to a near-death spiral for one company in particular was the smartphone explosion. That explosion, which only grew as Apple and Google (GOOGL) entered the race with their software platforms, transformed the landscape and laid waste to early market share leaders Blackberry (BBRY) and Palm.
Sometimes a catalyst for some companies can be a headwind for others. Take the current bout of falling oil prices. It’s good for airlines and likely good for consumers, but not good for oil-producing companies, which have already cut capital spending and announced layoffs earlier this year due to the initial fall in oil prices. These drops also are likely to curb demand for alternative energy solutions like solar and wind, which makes falling oil an inhibitor, or headwind, for companies like First Solar (FSLR), SolarCity (SCTY) and SunPower Corp. (SPWR).
The bottom line is even if shares of a company’s stock are cheap, if you can’t identify a catalyst — or if you uncover an inhibitor — you probably should move along and look at another stock instead.
I’ll be back next week with the final question you have to answer before you buy any stock.
In case you missed it, I encourage you to read my e-letter column from last week, which detailed the eighth question on our list of 10 questions to answer before you buy any stock. I also invite you to comment in the space provided below my commentary.
Upcoming Appearances
This content is for paid subscribers only. To gain access subscribe to one of our…
It is hard to find a seasoned investor who doesn’t believe the stock market is…
No one believes a financial disaster can strike… until it’s too late. That’s bizarre, considering…
The Options Industry Council is a resource used to educate investors about the benefits and…
The put-call parity is the relationship that exists between put and call prices of the…
“It’s not a stock market, it’s a market of stocks.” -- “Maxims of Wall Street,”…